Human QA for AI-generated work

Audit AI outputsbefore you trust them.

AI can sound confident while being incomplete, risky, or wrong. Send the output and what you plan to use it for; I return concrete findings, risk flags, prompt guidance, and a safer version before it reaches a customer, client, or decision.

Direct audits available
Quick Output Audit $49 · Batch Review $149 · Workflow Audit $299

01

Customer-facing answers

Emails, support replies, chatbot responses, FAQs, and service explanations customers may read or act on.

Checked for

Unverified promises, unclear ownership, missing next steps, inaccurate claims, and wording that could frustrate customers.

02

Business documents

AI-assisted proposals, SOPs, summaries, reports, policies, landing page sections, and internal instructions.

Checked for

Weak reasoning, missing assumptions, unclear instructions, formatting issues, and claims that need a human source check.

03

Prompt + output pairs

You send the prompt, AI answer, and intended use. I check whether the answer actually satisfies the task.

Checked for

Instruction misses, weak constraints, missing context, and prompt changes that would produce a safer next draft.

04

AI product responses

Generated answers from chatbots, AI tools, onboarding flows, or support assistants before they reach users.

Checked for

Bad reasoning, overconfident answers, missing disclaimers, user confusion, and recurring response-quality patterns.

Accuracy

Looks for: facts, numbers, names, timelines, and assumptions. You get: claims to verify before use.

Hallucination risk

Looks for: unsupported certainty, invented details, and source gaps. You get: what should be removed, softened, or checked.

Usefulness

Looks for: whether the answer solves the actual task. You get: what is helpful, missing, or just filler.

Completeness

Looks for: missing steps, context, owners, and next actions. You get: what to add before relying on it.

Tone fit

Looks for: audience fit, clarity, confidence level, and robotic phrasing. You get: wording changes that make it safer to send.

Business risk

Looks for: overpromising, customer confusion, and compliance-adjacent flags. You get: a use/edit/do-not-use recommendation.

Sample audit format · demonstration only

Trust score 72/100

Main issues

  • Promises a refund timeline without verified order status.
  • Does not ask for the details needed to check the refund.
  • Leaves the customer without a clear owner or next action.

Recommendation

Do not send unchanged. Remove the unverified timeline, ask for the order identifier, and explain who will check status next.

View full sample

01

Send the output + intended use

Share the AI response, what it is for, and the prompt if available. Remove private details if the material is sensitive.

02

I mark what to trust, fix, or verify

The report separates issues into concrete findings: unsupported claims, missing steps, tone problems, risk flags, and prompt fixes.

03

You get a decision-ready report

Each audit includes a trust score, prioritized fixes, prompt guidance, safer wording when useful, and a use/edit/do-not-use recommendation.

04

Use AI with more confidence

You know what to verify, what to change, and whether the output is ready for a customer, client, internal team, or public page.

Positioning: this is not an "AI detector." It is human quality control for AI-generated work before it becomes a business decision, customer message, or published asset.

Customer support replies Chatbot responses AI-generated reports Proposals FAQs SOPs Website copy Prompt outputs

Send it before you use it.

Start with one AI output and its intended use. I will send back a trust score, prioritized fixes, risk flags, and safer wording where needed.